To share what I've learned !

I was confused by the wording of Cisco regarding the route-map continue statement Route maps have a linear behavior, not a nested behavior. Once a route is matched in a route map permit entry with a continue command clause, it will not be processed by the implicit deny at the end of the route-map. Therefore I've designed the following lab to check the actual behaviour  R1 configuration: R1#show run Building configuration... ! hostname R1 ! interface Loopback0 ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 ! interface Loopback1 ip address 20.20.20.1 255.255.255.0 ! interface FastEthernet1/0 ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.252 duplex auto speed auto ! router bgp 65001 no synchronization bgp router-id 1.1.1.1 bgp log-neighbor-changes network 20.20.20.0 mask 255.255.255.0 neighbor 10.10.10.2 remote-as 65002 neighbor 10.10.10.2 send-community both neighbor 10.10.10.2 route-map TEST out no auto-summary ! ip bgp-community new-format ! route-map TEST permit 10 set community